Monday, November 30, 2015

Family Thanksgiving Trip: Jonathan Edwards 2015


Over the Thanksgiving holiday, my family went on an excursion into Connecticut and Massachusetts in order to spend a few days afield together in a road trip setting. Because of the intended destination, and inspired by a trip by Tony Reinke, I realized we would have a wonderful opportunity to see some sites affiliated with Jonathan Edwards, George Whitefield, and the Great Awakening.

We departed from our hometown Tinton Falls, NJ right after Thanksgiving supper on Thursday and we traveled to Enfield, CT.  Here's a list of some of the sites we visited (HT to Reinke's post for the Google map locations of these sites and the page references to George Marsden's excellent biography of Jonathan Edwards):

Enfield, CT

On the July 8, 1741 sermon see Marsden, 219-226. Listen to Mark Dever read/preach the message in 58-minutes (link here).
Location: 41.971588,-72.592761 (stone marker)

My family at the preaching site of "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God"

East Windsor, CT

Timothy Edwards’ church
Timothy was Edwards father and he was a pastor. This is the site of the East Windsor awakening of 1716. For background reading see Marsden, 33-34.


Jonathan Edwards’ birthplace (Oct 5, 1703) and childhood
For background reading on Edwards’ childhood and his early memories of the natives see Marsden, 11-24. 
Location: 41.844849,-72.611963 (birthplace marker)

Gideon and I at the birthplace of Jonathan Edwards

Edwards Cemetery
Resting place for his parents (Timothy and Esther Edwards) and two daughters (Jerusha and Lucy).

Gabriel and I at the grave of Timothy Edwards

Northampton, MA

Jonathan Edwards’ church location
See the commemorative plaque for the 1737 church on the front steps and the JE plaque inside. For background read about the periods of awakenings in the church read Marsden, 150-169.

Jonathan Edwards plaque

West Brookfield, MA

George Whitefield Rock
Whitefield preached from this boulder to a gathering of a few hundred people on Oct 16, 1740 on his way to Northampton.

George Whitefield Rock

Princeton, NJ

Princeton Cemetery
Resting place for Jonathan and Sarah Edwards. Readings: passings and burials in Marsden, 490-498.

Gideon and I visiting about Jonathan Edwards' legacy at Edwards' grave

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Stephen Charnock: What is God? (Quid Deus Sit?)

The doctrine of God was the foundational starting point in Reformed dogmatics and was typically arranged under five headings: the names of God, the being of God, the attributes of God, the works of God, and the persons of the Godhead (Beeke and Jones, A Puritan Theology, 60). 

The first three categories - the names of God, the being of God, and the attributes of God - address the doctrine of God in the strict sense. 

The fourth topic - the works of God - concerns the outworking of the divine decree and has an obvious relation to the previous three headings. The Trinity (i.e., the three persons of the Godhead) has its own category because Reformed theologians often spoke of “God” in a twofold sense: essentially and personally. 

Essentially, “God” refers to the divine essence or substance; personally, “God” refers to each (or all) of the three persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. 

Connected to these categories is the humanist series of questions that were commonplace in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century academic discourse: An sit? (Whether it be so?); Quid sit? (What is it?); and Quale sit? (Of what sort is it?). 

Stephen Charnock’s doctrine of God begins by answering the question whether God exists or not. In his magnificent Discourse on the Existence and Attributes of God, the first two "chapters" cover the existence of God as he reflects on Psalm 14:1 and the "Practical Atheism" as he again reflects on Psalm 14:1. 

He then moves to the question of what sort of being God is, followed by a discussion of the most important attributes of God. Of course, the attributes of God are closely related to the question of God’s being, for if the attributes are God’s perfections then we are able to deduce from them what sort of being God is.

This discussion occurs around an exposition John 4:24, “God is a Spirit,” the familiar words which are a part of the dialogue between Jesus and the Samaritan woman.  In the discourse, Charnock 
‘God is a Spirit.’ That is, he hath nothing corporeal, no mixture of matter; not a visible substance, a bodily form. He is a Spirit, not a bare spiritual substance, but an understanding, willing Spirit; holy, wise, good, and just. Before Christ spake of the Father, ver. 23, the first person in the Trinity, now he speaks of God essentially. The word Father is personal, the word God essential. So that our Saviour would render a reason, not from any one person in the blessed Trinity, but from the divine nature, why we should worship in spirit; and therefore makes use of the word God, the being a spirit being common to the other persons with the Father.
-- Stephen Charnock, The Complete Works of Stephen Charnock, vol. 1 (Edinburgh; London; Dublin: James Nichol; James Nisbet and Co.; W. Robertson; G. Herbert, 1864–1866), 260.
Charnock notes that John 4:24 is the only place in the whole Bible where God is explicitly described as a Spirit, at least in these very words (totidem verbis). 
It is the observation of one, that the plain assertion of God’s being a Spirit is found but once in the whole Bible, and that is in this place; which may well be wondered at, because God is so often described with hands, feet, eyes, and ears, in the form and figure of a man. The spiritual nature of God is deducible from many places; but not anywhere, as I remember, asserted totidem verbis but in this text. (Charnock, Works, 262)
If God exists, He must necessarily be immaterial or incorporeal, since material is by nature imperfect.
Spirit is taken various ways in Scripture. It signifies sometimes an aerial substance, as Ps. 11:6, ‘A horrible tempest;’ Heb., ‘A spirit of tempest;’ sometimes the breath, which is a thin substance: Gen. 6:17, ‘All flesh wherein is the breath of life;’ Heb., ‘Spirit of life.’ A thin substance, though it be material and corporeal, is called spirit; and in the bodies of living creatures, that which is the principle of their actions is called spirits, the animal and vital spirits; and the finer parts extracted from plants and minerals we call spirits, those volatile parts separated from that gross matter wherein they were immersed, because they come nearest to the nature of an incorporeal substance. And from this notion of the word, it is translated to signify those substances that are purely immaterial, as angels and the souls of men. Angels are called spirits, Ps. 104:4; ‘Who makes his angels spirits,’ Heb. 1:14. And not only good angels are so called, but evil angels, Mark 1:27. Souls of men are called spirits, Eccles. 12, and the soul of Christ is called so, John 19:30, whence God is called ‘the God of the spirits of all flesh,’ Numb. 16:22: and spirit is opposed to flesh: Isaiah 31:3, ‘The Egyptians* are flesh, and not spirit.’ And our Saviour gives us the notion of a spirit to be something above the nature of a body, Luke 24:39; not having flesh and bones, extended parts, loads of gross matter. It is also taken for those things which are active and efficacious, because activity is of the nature of a spirit. Caleb had ‘another spirit,’ Numb. 14:24, an active affection. The vehement motions of sin are called spirit, Hos. 4:12, ‘The spirit of whoredoms,’ in that sense that Prov. 29:11, ‘A fool utters all his mind,’ ‘all his spirit;’ he knows not how to restrain the vehement motions of his mind. So that the notion of a spirit is, that it is a fine immaterial substance, an active being, that acts itself and other things. A mere body cannot act itself, as the body of man cannot move without the soul, no more than a ship can move itself without wind and waves.
So God is called a Spirit, as being not a body, not having the greatness, figure, thickness or length of a body, wholly separate from anything of flesh and matter. We find a principle within us nobler than that of our bodies, and therefore we conceive the nature of God according to that which is more worthy in us, and not according to that which is the vilest part of our natures. God is a most spiritual spirit, more spiritual than all angels, all souls (μονοτρὸπως). As he exceeds all in the nature of being, so he exceeds all in the nature of spirit. He hath nothing gross, heavy, material in his essence. (Charnock, Works, 262-263).
Charnock, in a similar vein to many Reformed orthodox theologians, argues by way of negation. Charnock affirms that God can be described in two ways: by affirmation (e.g., God is good) and by negation (e.g., God has no body). In Charnock’s view, the way of negation is the best way to understand God; indeed, it is the way we commonly understand God. To describe God, the word “mutable” becomes “immutable”; that is, God cannot change.

By affirming that God is a spirit, one is at the same time affirming what He is not (i.e., He has no body). As opposed to a material existence, God’s being is noncomposite. Moreover, because God is a spirit, Charnock is able to show how this necessarily speaks to His other attributes, a point which will be taken up in a later post. The point that Charnock makes though is that there must be consistency between God’s essence and His attributes; otherwise He cannot be God. 

By beginning with God’s spirituality, Charnock is in line with the Westminster Confession of Faith, which makes spirituality the first of the attributes of God: “There is but one only living and true God, who is infinite in being and perfection, a most pure spirit, invisible, without body” (WCF, 2.1). 

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Stephen Charnock (1628-1680): An Introduction

The Puritan Stephen Charnock was born in 1628 in St. Katherine Cree, London. He was the son of Richard Charnock, who was a solictor (attorney) in London. 

At the age of 14 he attended Emmanuel College, Cambridge, a Puritan stronghold, under the tutelage of William Sancroft, who later became the Archbishop of Canterbury. This is likely where Charnock was converted in two different ways - first to the cause of Christ as he received God's grace - and secondly to the Puritan cause. 

He received his degree, the bachelor of arts, in 1646, and began ministering in Southwark, London and serving as chaplain to a private family. This was right around the beginning of the English Civil War. 

In 1649, we was made a Fellow of New College, Oxford by the Parliamentary Visitors where he was to receive his Master of Arts degree in 1652. By 1652, he was made Senior Proctor of the University, a post he held until 1656, when he left for Ireland with Richard Cromwell, the Lord Protector Oliver's brother, who was the governor of Ireland. He served as Richard's chaplain and preached regularly. His preaching made a profound impact there. While there, he received the honorary degree of Bachelor in Divinity, a gift of Trinity College, Dublin.

Charlock returned to London in 1660, an inauspicious moment when at the restoration of Charles, he lost his post in Ireland and because of the Great Ejection and the draconian legislation that made up the Clarendon Code, was not able to man a ministry post in England. He was ejected from the Established Church in 1662, under the terms of the Act of Uniformity. In 1666, Charnock lost his personal library in the great fire of London. He continued his ministry in secret as a non-conformist, visiting the Reformed centers in Holland and France. He continued to study and write. His life was noted for its piety, scholarship, and extraordinary command of the languages of the Bible.

In 1675, when restrictions began to be relaxed against the non-conformists, Charnock took up a co-pastorate with the great Puritan Thomas Watson at the congregation at Crosby Hall, Bishopgate Street, London. He remained there until his death in 1680 at the age of 52. The presence of these two great Puritan voices at Crosby Hall made it a significant bastion of Puritan non-conformism while their ministry continued there.

It was Charnock's intention during the years spent at Crosby Hall that he would complete a "body of divinity" - what we would now call a systematic theology. His most famous work, The Existence and Attributes of God, were originally delivered as fourteen discourses to his congregation. These discourses, now assembled and published in his Existence and Attributes book, were the limit of his work on the body of divinity. Nonetheless, the represent the high point and classic Reformed treatment of the doctrine of God. The Discourses is marked by profound thought, and humble adoration of God.

The only work that Charnock published during his lifetime was the sermon "The Sinfulness and Cure of Evil Thoughts." After his death, his Oxford friends Richard Adams and Edward Veal, prepared Charnockx' paper and manuscripts for publication. The complete works of Charnock are available today in a five volume set of his complete works available from Banner of Truth.

Also, do not miss the interesting account of Charnock’s life and character by William Symington available to be read freely online at the Banner of Truth Trust.

The contents of his complete works in the five-volume set are as follows:

VOLUME ONE contains a helpful introduction to Charnock’s life and work by James McCosh, and the first eight discourses on The Existence and Attributes of God, opening with ‘A Discourse of Divine Providence,’ based on 2 Chronicles 16:9. In this Charnock sets forth the doctrine of providence with great clarity, and then applies it to instruct, comfort, and exhort the people of God.

VOLUME TWO continues and concludes Charnock’s magnum opus, ‘A Discourse on the Existence and Attributes of God’ with the remaining six discourses. Topics include: the existence of God; practical atheism; God’s being a Spirit; spiritual worship; the eternity of God; his immutability; his omnipresence; his knowledge; his wisdom; his power; his holiness; his goodness; his dominion; and his patience. Each discourse first expounds, then applies, the text of Scripture on which it is based.

VOLUME THREE concerns the work of regeneration, by which spiritually dead sinners are raised to new life in Christ. It is perhaps surprising that present-day Christians seem so often to be confused about what it means to be born again. Whatever the reasons for this confusion, the fault cannot be laid at the door of previous generations of preachers and writers, particularly Puritans like Charnock, who took immense pains to search into and explain the doctrine from Scripture.

VOLUME FOUR contains fifteen further discourses of primary importance to Christians in every age. The first six discourses – all on texts from the Gospel of John – focus on the knowledge of God in Christ as the only way to eternal life and happiness, showing that true and saving knowledge of God is only in and by Christ, that conviction of sin by the Spirit of God is the way to this knowledge, and that to remain in unbelief is to remain in misery under the wrath of God. The Lord’s Supper and related matters form the subject of a second group of discourses.

VOLUME FIVE contains a further nineteen discourses. By way of contrast with the earlier volumes – most of which are based on texts from the New Testament – five of the discourses here draw on texts from the Old Testament Scriptures. Many of the topics addressed are of perennial interest to all Christians: the necessity of Christ’s death, and the necessity of his exaltation; Christ’s intercession; God in Christ as the object of faith; afflictions; mortification; the stability of the church; delight in prayer; the sins of the regenerate; man’s enmity to God; and the pardon of sin.

For further reading:

The wonderful work Meet the Puritans edited by Beeke and Pedersen recommends the reader to pursue the following significant works by Charnock:

Christ Crucified: A Puritan’s View of Atonement (CFP; 207 pages; 1996). Edited and introduced by Maurice Roberts, this edition is easier to read than the original work. Linking the Old and New Testaments, Charnock explains how Christ’s sacrifice fulfills the Old Testament requirements. He particularly illustrates the importance of the Passover and shows how Christ is the Passover for believers. These sermons focus on the Lord’s Supper (its end, subjects, unworthy receiving, and self-examination) and Christ’s death (its voluntariness, acceptableness, and necessity).

Divine Providence (IO; 150 pages; 2005). Based on 2 Chronicles 16:9, Charnock explains God’s providence with depth of insight, and presents its various uses with pastoral and experiential care. This is a standard Puritan treatment of providence, second only to that of John Flavel’s Mystery of Providence. This present reprint is taken from the 1864 James Nichol edition of Charnock’s Complete Works.

The Doctrine of Regeneration (GM; 306 pages; 2000). This treatise proceeds from the necessity of regeneration to its nature, its author (God as the sufficient author and sole agent), and its instrument, the gospel. Charnock closes the book with these words: “Before you wait upon God in any ordinance, plead with him as Moses did in another case, to what purpose should I go, unless thy presence go with me?”

The Existence and Attributes of God (Baker; 1,149 pages; 2000). Originally a private journal, this voluminous and magisterial work was first published in 1681–1682 as volume 1 and 2 of his works in the Nichol series (without Charnock’s essay on providence). It is a treasure of sound theology, profound thinking, and humble adoration of God. The following discourses are included: the existence of God, practical atheism, God as Spirit, spiritual worship, the eternity of God, the immutability of God, God’s omnipresence, God’s knowledge, the wisdom of God, the power of God, the holiness of God, the goodness of God, God’s dominion, and God’s patience.

J. I. Packer writes of this classic, “The discourses are the product of a big, strong, deep, reverent mind; they are in every way worthy of their sublime subject and are one of the noblest productions of the Puritan epoch. Charnock displays God’s attributes as qualities observable in the concrete actions of the living God of which the Bible speaks. The technical terms, and sometimes, arguments of scholastic theology are employed, but always with a biblical orientation. Charnock has no desire to speculate but only to declare the works and ways, the nature and character, of the God of the Bible” (Encyclopedia of Christianity, 2:411).

This is the work on the character and attributes of God. It should be read by every serious Christian. The twelfth discourse on the goodness of God, covering nearly 150 pages, is unsurpassed in all of English literature.

This edition is prefaced with an interesting account of Charnock’s life and character by William Symington. Charnock spent the last three years of his life writing his magnum opus. Apparently, he intended to preach an entire “body of divinity” but he came no further than the attributes of God before being translated to glory at the age of fifty-two.

The Knowledge of God (BTT; 604 pages; 1995). This fourth volume of Charnock’s works contains the following discourses: the knowledge of God, the knowledge of God in Christ, conviction of sin, unbelief, the misery of unbelievers, signs of unbelievers, the end of the Lord’s Supper, the subjects of the Lord’s Supper, unworthy receiving of the Lord’s Supper, self-examination, the knowledge of Christ crucified, Christ our Passover, the voluntary death of Christ, the acceptableness of Christ’s death, and obedience. This volume is weighty and a bit tedious, yet is eminently scriptural and experiential.

The New Birth (BTT; 544 pages; 1996). Originally the third volume of Charnock’s works, this collection contains discourses on regeneration, the Word as instrument of regeneration, God as author of regeneration, and the cleansing virtue of Christ’s blood. Though repetitive, this volume provides a first-rate exposition of one of Christianity’s most fundamental doctrines.

Truth and Life (BTT; 592 pages; 1997). This fifth and concluding volume of Charnock’s works contains discourses on the necessity of Christ’s death, Christ’s exaltation, Christ’s intercession, the object of faith, afflictions, the removal of the gospel, mercy received, mortification, proving weak grace victorious, the sinfulness and cure of thoughts, the church’s stability, the fifth of November (an anniversary of English deliverance), delight in prayer, mourning for other men’s sins, comfort for child-bearing women, the sins of the regenerate, the pardon of sin, man’s enmity to God, and chief sinners as the objects of God’s choicest mercy. Also included is an index to Charnock’s works in the Nichol series.